Thursday, December 16, 2010

Six not-so-simple steps toward protecting people from dangerous drugs

Over the past two years there has been a steady diet of books and media reports about the disturbing influence the pharmaceutical industry has on medical research and doctors' prescribing patterns. Not a week goes by without a new report on the marketing muscle of the industry and the pervasive ties between the industry and the doctors upon whom we rely for supposedly objective medical advice.

A recent addition to this growing body of literature is The Risks of Prescription Drugs, which explains why the number of Americans taking prescription drugs has soared 72 percent in the last decade, with the result that an estimated 46 million Americans suffer from adverse side effects and 2.2 million are hospitalized every year. The book is co-written by five health policy experts and for the most part coalesces what has been written about in other places, including Marcia Angell's The Truth about Drug Companies, Jerome Kassirer's On the Take, Howard Brody's Hooked, Melody Petersen's Our Daily Meds, Peter Conrad's The Medicalization of Society and Side Effects, along with many newspaper reports.

However, The Risks of Prescription Drugs, published by Columbia University Press, does two things particularly well. First, it explains in a clear concise fashion why, despite the fact most new drugs offer little or additional benefit over existing meds, so many doctors prescribe these new drugs, exposing patients to serious side effects and adding billions in wasted costs to an already overburdened health care system.

Second, in the final chapter, the book offers comprehensive solutions to the problem, such as:

* Prohibit direct to consumer advertising by drug companies (because advertising to patients conveys inherently commercialized, biased information). Read more about this here.
* Create a stronger more independent Food and Drug Administration by more fully funding this federal agency so that it is no longer reliant on drug company user fees. (As reported in Side Effects, drug company money now accounts more than half of the FDA's entire drug-review budget.
* Change FDA policy so that new drugs are tested against existing drugs rather than against a placebo or sugar pill. (Right now, most drugs only need to show they are more effective than a placebo to win FDA approval).
* Reduce the commercial influence on doctors. While some medical schools such as Harvard have enacted strict policies prohibiting doctors from accepting free gifts, lunches and lucrative consulting and speaking deals from drug companies, too many others continue to allow such conflicts, all of which have been shown to bias doctors' judgment as researchers and clinicians).
* Get Big Pharma out of medical education. The Carlat Psychiatry blog makes a persuasive, ongoing case for why drug companies should not be allowed to fund continuing medical education.
* Limit the prescribing of unapproved uses of drugs, since such off-label uses are responsible for many of the adverse side effects seen in patients. See more about this here and here.
* Create and fund a new federal institute of medical science that can run clinical trials of new medications free of the drug industry's commercial interests. This institute could also be charged with doing objective research that compares the effectiveness of new products with existing drugs. As reported here, in the economic stimulus bill passed last year, President Obama included $1.1 billion for just this kind of comparative effectiveness research, but that should only be the beginning of a much larger, more comprehensive effort).

While all of these solutions are crucial if we want to improve our health care system and protect the public from dangerous and unnecessary drugs, the reality is that they will require the kind of political will that is in short supply on Capital Hill these days. That doesn't mean, however, that we should stop working toward such reforms. If anything, books like The Risk of Prescription Drugs are more important than ever -- in getting the truth out.

4 comments:

Becky Murphy said...

Alison,
Great post! Thank you for your work!

Happy Holidays!

Becky

parental unit said...

Excellent post!

Have you seen this - the rating of drug company influence in Medical Schools rated by Medical Students. Hope Springs eternal...

Pam said...

Wow, I am so glad I ran across this Blog. My own son has been a victim of medication side effects since he was one month old. He is now nine. He has had three surgeries, and many tests and procedures all because of what we thought were symptoms. We now know they were side effects of the medications he was on. I have recently submitted a DNA test to a lab to see if he is a slow metabolizer of medication. I hope this will help explain why he suffered all the side effects of medication and none of the benefits. Not one doctor caught this. They just continued to pile on more medication in hopes of "fixing" him. Now he is almost a month with out medication and a different kid. He still is suffering the effects however of missing out on crucial learning and development as he grew. We hope to catch him up with his peers and that he will continue to be happy. I want to help spread the word about this and plan on writing a book of my own about his ordeal. More parents need to be aware of this. Many of the medications he took are advertised on T.V, some have even become OTC.
This scares me.
Thanks again for your posts.

Brian said...

Great info thanks for posting. Do you need info on eating disorder rehab? then you should really check these guys out they really take care of their patients.